A life partnership is similar to the characteristics of marriage and refers to cohabitation outside marriage. We advise you on all facets of life partnership contracts. We are also committed to the development and implementation of such agreements. 3. The parties each acknowledge that they enter into the agreement voluntarily, without undue coercion or influence, and that each has had the opportunity to consult the lawyer of their choice; The patterns of marriage, divorce and cohabitation without marriage had changed for years. The incidence of national partnerships is increasing worldwide and, according to the 1996 census, 1.3 million people reported living with a partner. By the time the population census arrived in 2001, this figure had almost doubled to nearly 2.4 million. Many people think that if they live together for a while, the relationship will be recognized by the state, and there will be rights, duties and legal protections. But there was no common marriage – because the concept was abolished all over the world. The time a couple spends together does not lead to a default marriage.
As a result, in the event of a breakdown in the relationship, any assets or commitments are determined or distributed on the basis of the agreement reached by the parties during their relationship. 1. The parties currently co-exist in a domestic partnership and intend to continue to co-exist in this agreement; If you and your partner live together, you should consider entering into a life partnership pact to protect yourself if your relationship ends. If a party can see this, that party would be entitled to the assets held by the parties before and during the universal partnership. Although the courts have ruled that there is an explicit or tacit partnership, it becomes difficult to prove that such legal obligations exist. Life partnerships are problematic insofar as the relationships between the parties have the same legal and submersible consequences, but there is no legal support if the partnership is broken either by the breakdown of the relationship or by death. If the life partners are the co-owners, neither of them can exclude the other from the use or control of such assets. Unless they have a social contract, one of them can alienate his own share of the common patrimony without the consent of the other. If the life partnership collapses and the life partners fail to agree on the distribution of assets, one of them can take legal action in communei dividundo, in which the court appoints a liquidator or liquidator to distribute the assets. 2. The parties wish to define their respective property rights and commitments under their national partnership agreement; Property Another fundamental consequence of marriage is the way in which the parties want to deal with the property they own or will own.
The Marriage Property Act provides for different matrimonial property regimes to regulate the proprietary consequences of marriage. Parties to a marriage can marry either in a community of ownership or in aerobics, with or without credit, which allows them to plan their affairs. For life partners, there can be no common succession and what each partner acquires is his own. What may seem relatively simple at the time quickly becomes complex when the partnership in which partners have purchased real estate together or a partner has contributed to the cost of living during the life of the partnership is dissolved. The National Partnerships Act was still being drafted and it was unclear how it would be implemented. Under the current constitutional exception, it is unlikely that a partner will remain in despair by taking into account the National Partnerships Act. My advice would be for couples to live together, to enter into a contract – a written partnership agreement that defines exactly what happens in the event of death or splitting, protects their rights and defines their duties.